<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.8.0-dev (info@mypapit.net)" -->
<rss version="2.0"  xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Eide Neurolearning Feed</title>
        <description><![CDATA[The Eides' brain and learning news, research, and teaching tips for dyslexia, gifted children, attention, and other learning disabilities]]></description>
        <link>http://neurolearning.com/Library/</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 10:49:06 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.8.0-dev (info@mypapit.net)</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://neurolearning.com/Library/index.php?option=com_ninjarsssyndicator&amp;feed_id=1&amp;format=raw" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />        <item>
            <title>Welcome</title>
            <link>http://neurolearning.com/Library/component/content/article/1-welcome</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p><p><img class="caption" src="http://neurolearning.com/Library/images/stories/Eides09.jpg" border="0" alt="Drs. Brock and Fernette Eide" title="Drs. Brock and Fernette Eide" width="201" height="168" align="right" />Welcome!  We're Drs. Brock and Fernette Eide, authors of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1401308996?ie=UTF8&tag=neurolearni04-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=1401308996">The Mislabeled Child</a>. We've advocates of a brain-based understanding of children's learning differences and learning disabilities. Explore our library's pages for articles and videos on dyslexia, visual and spatial thinking, gifted and twice exceptional issues, sensory processing disorders, and temperament.  </p><p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
            <author> drseide@gmail.com (Administrator)</author>
            <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://neurolearning.com/Library/component/content/article/1-welcome</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Visual Distractibility and Auditory Processing Disorders</title>
            <link>http://neurolearning.com/Library/component/content/article/10-auditory-processing/12-visual-distractibility-auditory-processing-disorders</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>We often see parents shaking their heads - how is it that it's both auditory and visual processing? But it's not some odd luck, the visual and auditory systems are tightly coupled, and each makes up for the other when some problem arises.</p><p><br />  We shouldn't think of the brain having "deficits" - because reorganization is the rule rather than the exception, and generally loss in one domain, leads to compensatory changes in the other. Auditory processing problems are accompanied by increased sensitivities in other senses - and vision is one of the most common to cause trouble.</p><p><br />  The first breakthrough in our understanding of the yin and yang of the brain's sensory system came in research studies examining subjects who were either completely deaf or completely blind. Before there was a technology to image these events in the brain, neuroscientists had pondered what the auditory part of brain might do in a deaf person, or what the visual part of the brain might do in a blind person. Was it a specialized area of brain that would just never get the right signal? Would it just sit there? Or would it be collared into doing something else?</p><p><br />  The answer: it got put to work by the other senses.</p><p><br /> <a href="http://www.neurolearning.com/images/visualdeaf.jpg"> <img src="http://www.neurolearning.com/images/visualdeaf.jpg" border="0" /></a> In this remarkable figure, you can see that the outlined area of brain (auditory cortex) has now gotten recruited to work for the visual system. That's great you might say...if you can't hear, there are so many things that can creep up on you - so increased visual vigilance can protect you from danger. Yes -that's right, but increased visual sensitivity also comes with a price. The deaf are also much more sensitivity to visual distractibility (check out the teaching tips for the deaf, including recommendations to avoid shiny jewelery)...and in milder form, but no less significant, many children with central auditory processing disorders suffer this same fate. </p><p><br /> <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=11450960">Visual Reorganization in the Deaf</a> </p><p><a href="http://www.jneurosci.org/cgi/content/full/20/17/RC93">Visual Attention to the Periphery Enhanced in Deaf </a></p><p><a href="http://www.jneurosci.org/cgi/content/full/20/17/RC93"></a> <a href="http://www.tcd.ie/disability/services/tls_deaf.php">Deaf or Hard of Hearing - Teaching & Learning Supports - Trinity College Dublin</a></p>]]></description>
            <author> drseide@gmail.com (Administrator)</author>
            <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 07:58:18 GMT</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://neurolearning.com/Library/component/content/article/10-auditory-processing/12-visual-distractibility-auditory-processing-disorders</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Boys Think in Pictures, Girls Think in Words</title>
            <link>http://neurolearning.com/Library/component/content/article/16-boys-girls-learning/11-boys-think-in-pictures-girls-think-in-words</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_WCOK_fnfycE/SWpvAhnN7yI/AAAAAAAABRY/aX8dYXUuZ1Y/s1600-h/girlsboyswords.jpg"><img src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_WCOK_fnfycE/SWpvAhnN7yI/AAAAAAAABRY/aX8dYXUuZ1Y/s320/girlsboyswords.jpg" border="0" /></a> Here's an interesting <a href="http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=2478638&blobtype=pdf">study</a> looking at the different ways boys and girls process language. At almost every age, girls trump the boys in terms of language performance, but the surprising finding in this study was that strong performances were activated by different brain regions depending on gender. The implications? -boys and girls are wired to learn language differently.  Among the strong language performers who were girls, fMRI activations were highest in "conventional" language areas such as the left inferior frontal gyrus or left middle temporal gyrus. Among the strong language performers who were boys, however, the highest brain activation areas were visual association and imagery areas if words were presented visually or sound association (phonology) areas if the words were presented aurally. </p><p>  Excerpt: "The pattern of accuracy correlations suggests that girls’ linguistic judgments depended on information available to the language network regardless of the modality of word presentation, whereas accurate performance for boys depended on the modality of word presentation rather than the linguistic judgment required. These dramatic sex differences in the pattern of brain-behavior correlations reflect fundamental differences in the nature of processing required for accurate performance."  Whereas girls are processing words within the brain's language networks, boys' processing is more associational and link tied to the mode in which words are presented (e.g. by sight vs. sound).  <a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_WCOK_fnfycE/SWp5YOzKBuI/AAAAAAAABRg/N62fNzFJY6U/s1600-h/through.jpg"><img src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_WCOK_fnfycE/SWp5YOzKBuI/AAAAAAAABRg/N62fNzFJY6U/s320/through.jpg" border="0" /></a>The boys data is particularly interesting for the dyslexic boys we see. We've noticed that they are able to better remember sight spelling words like <em>through</em> if they are pictured with a doodle that reinforces the unusual part of spelling as well as its meaning. </p><p> Other interesting boys, girls learning posts: </p><p><a href="http://eideneurolearningblog.blogspot.com/2005/04/more-visual-learning-or-how-to-avoid.html">Eide Neurolearning Blog: Visual Learning</a> </p><p><a href="http://eideneurolearningblog.blogspot.com/2006/07/slower-developmental-processing-speed.html">Eide Neurolearning Blog: Slower developmental processing speed for boys</a>  </p><p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
            <author> drseide@gmail.com (Administrator)</author>
            <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 07:40:21 GMT</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://neurolearning.com/Library/component/content/article/16-boys-girls-learning/11-boys-think-in-pictures-girls-think-in-words</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Visual Crowding and Visual Overload</title>
            <link>http://neurolearning.com/Library/component/content/article/11-visual-processing/10-visual-crowding-visual-overload</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>"If there were only 10 problems on a page, I could do them all. But when there are 40 on a page, I can't do any of them." - 10 year old student   </p><p>Visual overload and visual crowding are common problems in every school classroom or company work group, but the mistakes and errors that result from them are rarely recognized or traced back to their true source. It is a paradox - the more you see, the less you see, but it all makes sense if one recognizes that a child or an adult's visual working memory deskspace can become easily overloaded.  </p><p>For visual scientists, visual crowding is a specific term that refers to a greater difficulty in seeing when other visual objects are present. When we look at a complex scene, for instance the picture above, it is impossible to take in all the other visual details. It's what causes some people to overload when they go to large gatherings like music concerts, Disneyland in the summertime, or a crowded Home Depot, but also children in crowded classroom, all-school assembly, writing on a scantron, or completing Mad Math Minutes. </p><p> <span style="font-weight: bold">Signs of Visual Overload</span></p><p> - Longer processing time, slow reading, and incomplete work on crowded worksheets</p><p>- Tantrums, irritability, and overload behaviors in crowded environments </p><p>- 'Careless' mistakes and unintentionally skipped problems on worksheets and tests </p><p>- Missed words or endings while reading, need to re-read words </p><p> Interestingly, a recent report on <a href="http://www.journalofvision.org/9/4/14/article.aspx">Visual crowding, reading, and dyslexia </a> found that a visual crowding effect significantly contributed to slowness in word reading, and dyslexics as a <a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_WCOK_fnfycE/SqSC-QpgCCI/AAAAAAAABoo/UxZqDJXpLU0/s1600-h/Picture+3.png"><img src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_WCOK_fnfycE/SqSC-QpgCCI/AAAAAAAABoo/UxZqDJXpLU0/s200/Picture+3.png" border="0" /></a>group found that increased spacing between letters improved readability. </p><p>The critical spacing threshold for readability was significantly higher for dyslexics as a group compared to non-dyslexic controls, so it became easier to identify a letter away from the center if the spacing between characters were greater. </p><p> <span style="font-weight: bold">Take-home points:</span> </p><p> - Critical print size is larger for dyslexics than controls</p><p> - Critical spacing between characters is larger for dyslexics than controls </p><p>- Reading rate improves with print size to a critical point</p><p> - Explains why many dyslexics with excellent verbal funds of knowledge still have trouble reading long words </p><p> <span style="font-weight: bold">Classroom and Test Accommodations</span>  In the classroom, more attention should be paid to print size and spacing in daily classroom (worksheets, handouts) and testing materials (as many as 1 in 5 students are dyslexic), and print size and spacing should be considered when purchasing books for students.  <a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_WCOK_fnfycE/SqSe8lTjI_I/AAAAAAAABow/EkyYEIhP93U/s1600-h/Picture-4.jpg"><img src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_WCOK_fnfycE/SqSe8lTjI_I/AAAAAAAABow/EkyYEIhP93U/s200/Picture-4.jpg" border="0" /></a></p><p><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_WCOK_fnfycE/SqSe8lTjI_I/AAAAAAAABow/EkyYEIhP93U/s1600-h/Picture-4.jpg"></a>Large print books and reader glasses may help some students,  whereas font differences (serifs like Times New Roman or hand-written fonts like Papyrus or Comic Sans often preferred) may be more important for others. </p><p>For students with narrow visual spans (see only few letters at a time), serifs or handwritten fonts may dramatically lessen the work of reading - with serifs or personalized font shapes - it is easier to perceive the overall shape of words, so that even if a reader only sees the first and last letters and general shape of the word, they can make an educated guess about what that word might be even though they are unable to see all the letters. </p><p> Many of you are probably aware of this meme from the Internet:  "Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe."  Matt Davis has written more about the science and history of the discovery of this effect <a href="http://www.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk/people/matt.davis/Cmabrigde/">here</a>. </p><p> <a href="http://eideneurolearningblog.blogspot.com/2007/04/vivid-visual-thinkers-blessings-and.html">Eide Neurolearning Blog: Blessing and burdens of vivid visual thinkers</a> </p><p><a href="http://eideneurolearningblog.blogspot.com/2007/05/visual-crowding-is-real-phenomenon-that.html">Eide Neurolearning Blog: Video game training increases visual span</a> </p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
            <author> drseide@gmail.com (Administrator)</author>
            <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 07:33:11 GMT</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://neurolearning.com/Library/component/content/article/11-visual-processing/10-visual-crowding-visual-overload</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Auditory Verbal Learners</title>
            <link>http://neurolearning.com/Library/component/content/article/7-auditory-verbal/9-auditory-verbal-learners</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>What about auditory learners? In most learning style discussions, auditory learning is paired with verbal ability - but we probably strong auditory-verbal skills are different from strong auditory-musical skills, although they can also exist together. In this first post about auditory learners, we'll focus on auditory-verbal. We'll talk about auditory-musical learners soon.  </p><p>In general, auditory verbal learners attract less discussion among learning style enthusiasts because they seem to flourish in conventional classroom settings where the teachers talk and the students are supposed to listen.  Strong auditory verbal learners like to processing information through a brain loop of listening-speaking-listening. They like to talk their way through information and tend to learn well with lecture, group discussions, interactive teaching, and books on tape. </p><p>Auditory verbal learners tend to have strong language skills, and may take to learning by speaking aloud, working in groups, or studying or taking notes with a tape recorder.   Sometimes strong auditory learners have visual memory problems. They are such strong auditory learners because they have learned that they are better with listening. Verbal mediation can often compensate a great deal for visual problems (e.g. some with dyslexia or premature birth), but these individuals may be more prone to overload if they hav</p><p>e to 'see' by listening at the same time they are listening.  Auditory imagery can be a powerful learning resource, as sounds can be associated with words, pictures, and images. Sometimes this is what children are doing when they make all sorts of noises and sounds as they think or work. We've included some articles and links on auditory imagery below. Also here's a nifty excerpt from an fMRI study of "the little voice in your head." This view is only an excerpt from the left side of the brain, an equally complicated pattern of activation is triggered on the right. <a href="http://www.neurolearning.com/images/littlevoice.jpg"><img src="http://neurolearning.com/Library/../images/littlevoice.jpg" border="0" /></a></p><p><a href="http://www.neurolearning.com/images/littlevoice.jpg"></a> <a href="http://www.rad.msu.edu/research/pages/Neuro/using_fmri/default.htm">Little Voice Auditory Imagery</a> </p><p><a href="http://www.columbia.edu/cu/gsas/cs/tch-rce/pages/tch-tip/sec/learning-styles.html">Learning Styles Including Auditory</a> </p><p><a href="http://www.learnmem.org/cgi/content/full/10/2/83">Auditory Perceptual Learning</a> </p><p><a href="http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/psych/pecp/1997/00000009/00000004/art00004">Modality-specific Auditory Imagery</a></p><p><a href="http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/psych/pecp/1997/00000009/00000004/art00004"></a> <a href="http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2405/is_n1_v119/ai_14153560">Auditory Imagery and Free Recall</a></p>]]></description>
            <author> drseide@gmail.com (Administrator)</author>
            <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 07:30:20 GMT</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://neurolearning.com/Library/component/content/article/7-auditory-verbal/9-auditory-verbal-learners</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Confessions of a Limited Working Memory Victim</title>
            <link>http://neurolearning.com/Library/component/content/article/9-memory/8-confessions-limited-working-memory</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>A friend recommended I watch neuroscientist Jill Taylor's <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UyyjU8fzEYU">TED talk Stroke of Insight</a>. In the talk, Dr. Taylor recounts her personal experiences with a stroke in her left language area. It's a remarkable lecture and a highly recommend it.  But I confess, her story got me thinking about my own learning differences, and in particular, my limitation with working memory. And I thought as a neurologist, maybe it would be interesting to some of you to share how I became aware of my working memory limitations and what my experiences are with it.  </p><p>As it often happens, I only accidentally discovered how bad my auditory working memory was when we were playing a memory game with our kids. To my surprise, I had the worst memory span in our family (we were practicing repeating back sentences of increasing length), all this despite the fact that working memory tends to increase into adulthood. </p><p> How is it that I only really discovered it now? One answer, I think, is <span style="font-weight: bold">Compensation.</span>  How could I get by well enough to make it through medical school and Harvard, and manage my share of the household to a reasonable degree? (I confess do forget to pick up things at the market and misplace items with regularity) And I know I'm not alone. Some ADD doomsayers wouldn't think that a person like me could exist, but there are many examples of other famously feeble LWMV's who have managed to survive and thrive*, and here are a few reasons why I think that may be so. </p><p><span style="font-weight: bold"> How Do Limited Working Memory Victims Survive and Thrive?</span> </p><p> <span style="font-weight: bold">1. Flitting Not Sitting </span>  Many successful adults with teeny tiny working memories flit about in their activities - some keep physically busy doing different things, while others keep intellectually busy in the same flitting way. Over the course of an hour, I may return to a difficult task multiple times, like a hummingbird drinking nector from different flowers. It allows me to take in as much as I can at one time, then break, then take another little sip again when I'm ready. It works for me because my long term memory is quite strong - it's just my working memory that is weak. I can remember where I was when I return to it, and this is working more productively than if I were to force myself not to switch off, but stick to a single task. I think taking in information with little interruptions also takes advantage of the novelty learning in me. Stick with something for a long time would seem like such a chore, but this way is manageable. </p><p> <span style="font-weight: bold">2. Long Term Memory is Strong</span>  If our long term working memory is strong, then a limited working memory doesn't have to be a huge handicap. Many gifted individuals with ADD may fit this pattern...how could they score so well on their IQ tests if they didn't have strong long term verbal or nonverbal memories? It's the kids and adults with both weak working and long term memories that face the greatest obstacles in school and life. </p><p> <span style="font-weight: bold"> 3. Successful LWMV's may be Strong Inductive or Bottom-Up Learners</span>  I have a suspicion that the LWMV is especially well-suited to the inductive learner, i.e. learners that learn best from firsthand hand experiences or personal example. Inductive learners are sometimes called bottom-up learners because they take information in from many different examples then reason back to rules based on patterns that they find. The LWMV-ADD-Inductive Learner connection may be why so many kids with attention complaints have <a href="http://eideneurolearningblog.blogspot.com/2009/03/biology-of-creativity-right-hemispheric.html">diffuse attention</a> and why we find they prefer to learn kinesthetically or from direct personal experiences. It seems that many of these kids seem to for a reason. </p><p><span style="font-weight: bold"> 4. Many LWMVs are Strong Interest-Based Learners</span>  There does seem to be a paradox that exists for many LWMV's: if something really captivates their interest, like music or photography for Ansel Adams or a beautiful problem to an LWMV mathematician or physicist, then persistence at a task doesn't seem to be a problem. It's like getting the key that unlocks all of memory's doors, and time may seem to stop. No doubt some outsiders would call this a LWMV's hyperfocus, but it misses the point if it doesn't recognize that only certain intrinsically motivating and pleasurable activities trigger this remarkable focusing and memory-enhancing phenomenon.  Anyway, some more things to think about when wrestling with decisions about what to do about limited working memory. </p><p>It is possible to survive and thrive even with itsy bitsy working memory spans.  *Some famous LWMV's: <a href="http://eideneurolearningblog.blogspot.com/2005/10/flashes-from-past-great-teacher.html">Enrico Fermi</a> often complained of a terrible memory. He took notes all the time and called his notebook his "artificial memory". From <a href="http://neurolearning.com/Library/www.math.nmsu.edu/~jlakey/m210/polya_mathematicians.pd">Polya's Mathematicians I Have Known</a>, "Are mathematicians absent-minded or eccentric? I don't know, but there are infinitely many stories purporting that they are, and I shall quote a few...There is a party at (David) Hilbert's house and Frau Hilbert suddenly notices that her husband has forgotten to put on a fresh shirt...David...meekly obeys and goes upstairs. Yet he does not come back. Five minutes pass, ten minutes pass...so Frau Hilbert goes up to the bedroom and there is Hilbert in his bed. You see it was the natural sequence of things: He took off his coat, then his tie, then his shirt, and so on, and went to sleep!" </p><p> If you'd like to read more, also check out <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=bsgNAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA33&lpg=PA33&dq=rouelle+forgetfulness+genius&source=bl&ots=Foyty2na_5&sig=U4ngdaI5vMKhpk1aDy8tHZ1HdnQ&hl=en&ei=jIFvS9fGBYngtgOBhNyxDQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CA0Q6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=rouelle%20forgetfulness%20genius&f=false">The Man of Genius</a>. Excerpt: "Forgetfulness is another of the characters of genius. It is said that Newton once rammed his niece's finger into his pipe; when he left his room to seek for anything he usually returned without bring it..." Now obviously not everyone with the working memory of a gnat is a genius, but the point I'm making today is that it is possible to achieve a certain level of success and still seem to have only the smallest file cabinet for working memory.  </p><p>BTW, if you think there's a high incidence of physicists and mathematicians in this group, you may be right. I have physicists and engineers in my family tree. Working memory limitations often run in families (but don't have to), and are seen more often in spatially-talented families, dyslexic families, etc. They may be attracted to simplicity because that's all they have room for. </p><p> <a href="http://eideneurolearningblog.blogspot.com/2006/07/motivation-memory.html">Eide Neurolearning Blog: Motivation and Memory</a> </p><p><a href="http://eideneurolearningblog.blogspot.com/2009/03/passion-and-flow-as-learning-strategy.html">Eide Neurolearning Blog: Passion and Flow as a Learning Strategy</a> </p><p><a href="http://eideneurolearningblog.blogspot.com/2009/06/adhd-different-reward-motivation.html">Eide Neurolearning Blog: ADHD - A Different Motivation Pathway?</a></p>]]></description>
            <author> drseide@gmail.com (Administrator)</author>
            <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 07:25:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://neurolearning.com/Library/component/content/article/9-memory/8-confessions-limited-working-memory</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Sensory Processing Disorders in a Learning DIsorders Clinic</title>
            <link>http://neurolearning.com/Library/component/content/article/12-sensory-processing/7-sensory-processing-disorders-learning-clinic</link>
            <description><![CDATA[In her groundbreaking work Sensory Integration and the Child Jean Ayers estimated that 5-10% of all children had disordered sensory integration. Carol Kranowitz, in her more recent sensory processing disorders classic The Out of Sync Child, places this number between 12-30%. Although a precise tally of the number of children affected by sensory processing disorders or dysfunction of sensory integration (DSI) is difficult to come by for a variety of reasons, our own experience as physicians specializing in treating children with learning disorders leads us to agree with these authors that sensory processing disorders is a vast, and vastly under-recognized, problem among pre-school and school aged children. In this article, we'd like to describe our experience with sensory processing disorders in children referred to our clinic by schools, physicians, or parents for evaluation of learning problems.<br /><br /><strong>Sensory Processing Problems are Common in Kids with Learning Disorders</strong> Using a set of diagnostic criteria combining patient history and clinical observation, we determined that of our last fifty consecutive patients, 52 percent had difficulties with sensory integration severe enough to contribute to their learning problems. The frequency of sensory processing disorders varied markedly according to age. In our 30 children under age 10, 70% had sensory processing disorders, while in children 10 and over, only 20% had sensory processing disorders. The reasons for this striking difference are not entirely clear. It is possible that the incidence of sensory processing disorders diminishes with age because the sensory processing disorder tends to lessen or resolve. However, it is also possible that the sensory processing disorder persists, but that many children tend over time to develop compensatory strategies for dealing with it so that it no longer produces so many bothersome complications. Most experts in sensory processing disorders lean toward the latter explanation. They feel that even in persons who have been treated with sensory integration therapy some signs of the disorder are still usually detectable, and that in untreated persons these signs are usually readily apparent. Our thoughts are somewhere in the middle. In our experience, the persistence of sensory processing disorders tends to vary according to its severity. Severely affected children (who are, probably not coincidentally, the ones most likely to have come to the attention of the occupational therapists who've done most of the research in this field) are likely to have the most persistent and troublesome symptoms later in life. On the other hand, children with mild to moderate symptoms may improve symptomatically, even without therapy, to show few or no signs of DSI as adolescents of adults. Even among more mildly affected children, though, therapy may be helpful in speeding progress and preventing emotional and behavioral complications that can persist lifelong.<br /><br /><strong>Diagnosing Sensory Processing Disorders in the Clinic</strong>: History Of the various historical and physical data we use to diagnose sensory processing disorders, no one type is able by itself either to make or break the diagnosis. We tend to view the information as a whole to see whether a pattern of sensory dysfunction and behavioral difficulties consistent with the diagnosis of sensory processing disorders emerges. Currently, we gather historical information on the children we see by having their parents answer a battery of 28 questions probing sensory seeking or avoidance, balance and motor issues, and energy level. Table 1 displays some of the most revealing data from the fifty children in our sample. In our current sample, parents of children diagnosed with sensory processing disorders were over five times more likely than parents of children without sensory processing disorders to say that their child: had a weak grasp and floppy muscle tone; was insecure with slides and escalators; avoided rough play and playground equipment; or, had unexpected falls while sitting in a chair or playing. This historical information is interesting in several respects. First, the importance of balance and gravitational security issues in children with sensory processing disorders suggest why vestibular/proprioceptive therapy as pioneered by Jean Ayers has been so successful in treating children with this disorder. Second, it is important to note how many children with sensory processing disorders have difficulties in the areas of motor energy and motor weakness. Our observations along these lines have led us to place a higher priority on motor conditioning and strengthening than that accorded by some traditional therapies. Third, this information is important because of what it suggests about the etiology of sensory processing disorders. Our own suspicion is that many of these clinical manifestations of sensory processing disorders may be due to a functional disorder of a specialized type of sensory nerve cell called "spindle afferents". Spindle afferents are important in regulating muscle tone, in muscle fatigue, and in spatial localization at the joints: all functions that are affected in sensory processing disorders . Returning to the data, all of our questions about tactile sensitivities and most of our questions about auditory sensitivities tend to be endorsed by more of the parents of sensory processing disorders kids. These questions, however, are not as specific for the disorder as the items mentioned above. Most of the questions we've tested regarding sensitivity for vision, smells, tastes, and sensory-seeking behavior have not been either sensitive or specific in identifying children with sensory processing disorders.<br />Interestingly, most of the questions we ask parents regarding mood, affect, social and emotional behaviors tend to sort poorly for kids with sensory processing disorders. Only one item is consistently endorsed by more parents of sensory processing disorders kids: "Has tantrums". In our current sample, 71% of parents whose child has sensory processing disorders said "yes" to this item. Only 46% of other parents endorsed it.<br /><br /><strong>Diagnosing Sensory Processing Disorders in the Clinic:</strong> Physical Exam On physical exam, kids with sensory processing disorders had low or abnormal muscle tone almost twice as often as kids without sensory processing disorders . Almost sixty percent of our sample had unusually floppy or spastic muscle tone. Nearly forty percent had a condition called "scapular winging" in which the muscles of the back are too weak to hold the shoulder blades in place: roughly twice the frequency as in children without sensory processing disorders . The proprioceptive or "spatial-positioning" problems in children with sensory processing disorders were reflected in their almost universal inability to feel the positions of their fingers in space. This condition, called "finger agnosia", affects just over half of our non-sensory processing disorders population, reflecting the numbers of children we see with primary motor, graphomotor, and sensory problems. Still, it is almost twice as common in our patients with sensory processing disorders . To understand what this condition means to a child, try to imagine what it must be like to attempt to write your name, draw a picture, button your shirt, or tie your shoes with fingers that don't know where they are in space or in what directions they're moving. Third, although our parent questionnaires didn't demonstrate a clear difference in sensory seeking behaviors between kids with sensory processing disorders and those without, our physical examination did show evidence of sensory seeking behavior in a full 85% of children with sensory processing disorders . Only 54% of children without sensory processing disorders showed such behavior. These activities included chair spinning, table and paper picking, fidgeting, kicking (table, chair, and examiner), crashing and bumping. Finally, although our historical questionnaire did not show variations in impulsive or hyperactive behaviors that correlated with the sensory processing disorders diagnosis, our examinations found marked discrepancies in such behaviors. Impulsive behaviors, such as grabbing items without asking, beginning test segments without waiting, and answering questions in an unplanned manner, were almost four times more common in children with sensory processing disorders . Hyperactive behaviors, such as running around the exam room, jumping and crashing into things, and fidgeting, were over five times more common in kids with sensory processing disorders. Attentional difficulties, which were present in essentially all children in both groups, did not superficially differ between groups. These findings raise important issues regarding the relationship of sensory processing disorders and ADHD, whose three cardinal manifestations are impulsivity, hyperactivity, and attentional disorder. Please see are article on sensory processing disorders and hyperactivity for more discussion.<br /><br /><strong>Conclusions</strong> Sensory processing disorders are remarkably common in the children we see with learning problems, especially in children under 10. The obvious, indeed inescapable, conclusion is that sensory processing disorders contribute significantly to the learning problems facing many of our children. We are encouraged by signs that this long neglected and profoundly important condition is finally beginning to receive the attention it deserves. We are optimistic that the future will bring many more advances in our understanding of this disorder and in our ability to help the children it affects.<br /><br /><strong>About the Authors:</strong> Brock and Fernette Eide are physicians and consultants to a wide range of parent, teacher, and clinical professional groups seeking more information about brain-based difficulties and their solutions. Together they have authored more than 50 articles and they speak internationally for keynote lectures, seminars, workshops, and small groups. The Eides can be contacted through their website at: www.neurolearning.com or by email at: drseide@gmail.com]]></description>
            <author> drseide@gmail.com (Administrator)</author>
            <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 04:10:19 GMT</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://neurolearning.com/Library/component/content/article/12-sensory-processing/7-sensory-processing-disorders-learning-clinic</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Hyperactivity, Impulsivity, and Sensory Processing</title>
            <link>http://neurolearning.com/Library/component/content/article/12-sensory-processing/6-hyperactivity-impulsivity-sensory-processing</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<br />In the previous article, we described our experience of sensory processing disorders or dysfunction of sensory integration in a group of 50 consecutive children seen in a general learning disorders clinic.[i] We reported that 52% of these children (70% of those under 10) had problems with sensory processing severe enough to contribute to their learning difficulties. We also reported that children with sensory processing were far more likely than those without to show evidence of hyperactivity or impulsivity on exam. During our exam, 50% of the children with sensory processing disorders engaged in hyperactive behaviors such as running around the exam room, jumping and crashing into things, or extreme fidgeting, while only 9% of the children without sensory processing problems showed such behaviors. We observed impulsive behaviors, such as grabbing items without asking, beginning test questions without waiting, and answering questions in an unplanned manner, in 31% of children with sensory processing disorders but only 8% of children without.<br /><br />We pointed out in that article that these findings raise important questions regarding the relationship of sensory processing disorders and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), whose cardinal manifestations are hyperactivity, impulsivity, and distractibility or attentional impairment. In this article, we would like to address these questions in further detail, drawing additional information from our review of 50 children. We would like to state at the start of this discussion that this informal review of fifty cases clearly does not constitute definitive proof of any particular hypotheses. However, we do feel that our experience is highly suggestive and has important implications for parents, teachers, and clinicians who care for children with sensory processing disorders regarding the need for careful screening and evaluation of these children. With this caution in mind we would like to turn to the data.<br /><br />In our group of 50 children, 18 showed evidence of hyperactivity (8), impulsivity (3, or both (7) on exam. Perhaps the most remarkable thing about this group of children is the high prevalence--indeed the universality--of significant sensory or neurologic impairments. Table 1 summarizes the categories of sensory and neurologic impairments found in these children.<br />Three of these children (17%) had previously been diagnosed with ADHD. Each of these 3 was on stimulant medication for this disorder. Based on our assessment, three additional children from this group were strongly suspected of having ADHD and were referred back to their primary care providers for consideration of a trial of stimulant medications.<br />Fifteen of the18 children (83%) were diagnosed with DSI. Importantly, this subgroup of 15 children included all 7 who showed both impulsivity and hyperactivity on exam, all three who had previously been diagnosed with ADHD, and all 3 of the previously undiagnosed children whom we suspected of having ADHD.<br /><br />Twelve of the 18 children (67%) had significant visual abnormalities. These abnormalities included problems with tracking, convergence, binocularity, astigmatism, and acuity. Most of these problems were previously unsuspected, and each of them was significant enough to impact learning performance.<br /><br />Twelve of these 18 children (67%) also showed difficulties of auditory functioning consistent with the diagnosis of central auditory processing deficit (CAPD). During testing, these children repeatedly demonstrated behaviors characteristic of children with CAPD including prolonged auditory latency, frequent mishearing, hyperacusis, auditory distractibility, impaired inference and comprehension when listening compared with reading, and marked discrepancy between auditory short term memory (their ability to repeat back like a tape recorder) and auditory comprehension. Many of these children have subsequently had the diagnosis of CAPD confirmed by audiometric testing. Two additional children were found to have combined disorders of expressive and receptive language, and in addition to speech difficulties displayed many of the symptoms similar to the children with CAPD.<br /><br />Evidence of significant neurological dysfunction (in addition to those related directly to sensory processing disorders and ADHD) was also found in 12 (67%) of the 18 children. Four had mild hemiparesis and one had monoparesis. Two had evidence of significant bihemispheric injuries. Two had combined receptive and expressive language difficulties. One was diagnosed with a seizure disorder, one had Tourette's syndrome, one had a significant sensory neuropathy, and one was suffering from fetal alcohol syndrome. Again, most of these abnormalities had been previously undiagnosed.<br /><br />In total, all but one of the 18 children displayed either significant visual or auditory sensory difficulties, and the excluded child showed deficits from fetal alcohol syndrome so diffuse that adequate sensory exam was difficult. Each of the children with DSI had either a visual or auditory sensory disorder, and 7 of these 15 children had both.<br /><br />These findings raise several of important points regarding the evaluation and management of children with hyperactivity and impulsivity. The first and most important of these points is the absolute necessity of recognizing how frequently such children are suffering from sensory and neurological impairments other than primary attentional disorders. In our sample of 18 children, impairments of this kind were found in every child, and most had significant impairments in several systems.<br /><br />It is, of course, possible that the children in our sample are not entirely representative of children with hyperactivity and impulsivity in the general population. Eight of the 18 children (44%) have been placed in alternative learning environments as a result of their disabilities (see Table 2). Still, we have several reasons to suspect that they are representative enough to be revealing. First, many of our children were self-referred, and we were the first evaluators for some. And while we do have a specialty clinic and see many patients by referral, we are a community-based practice rather than an academic one, and as such are a first line of referral for children having difficulties. Second, ten (56%) of the children in our sample are enrolled in regular classes in public elementary or large private schools, and as such are probably a reasonable sample of children in typical educational settings. Third, others have previously noted high frequencies of neurologic impairments in children diagnosed with ADHD[ii]. In one particularly revealing article an ophthalmologist from the University of California at San Diego documented visual tracking abnormalities in nearly half of a sample of randomly selected children with ADHD[iii].<br /><br />Our findings also suggest several important points about sensory processing disorders. First, they highlight the fact that sensory processing disorders are frequently seen as a secondary manifestation of neurologic impairment, and they stress the importance of looking for evidence of specific sensory impairments in children with sensory behaviors. When brain development is impaired, either through injury or through the failure of primary sensory systems to promote appropriate growth of central processing centers, the brain attempts to compensate for this impairment by remodeling or rewiring.[iv] Compensatory rewiring can result in improved function in some respects, but it can also result in function that is poorly regulated if the new connections lack the appropriate balance of stimulatory and inhibitory influences. W<br />hen imbalance occurs in areas that regulate sensory or sensory motor functions, sensory processing dysfunction results, with its classic manifestations of hyper and hyposensitivities and their resulting sensory avoidant and sensory seeking behaviors.[v] In children with sensory processing disorders, behaviors often labeled hyperactive appear to be unreflective attempts to maintain sufficient arousal of their understimulated alertness centers to allow their brains to function in a useful way. That's why, in our experience, "hyperactive" behaviors in children with sensory processing disorders frequently sharpen their attention and improve focus on our testing, rather than impair their attention and performance.<br /><br />This process of impairment and rewiring also helps explain the frequent presence of distractibility in children with sensory processing disorders and/or sensory impairments. A clear example of the way such rewiring results in secondary distractibility is seen in persons who are deaf. When a child is born deaf, cerebral cortical areas usually reserved for auditory processing are recruited for other functions such as vision[vi]. Visual sensitivity may be somewhat improved in the central visual fields, but only at the expense of heightened visual distractibility at the periphery. This is why hearing-impaired readers often become paralyzed when trying to read visually busy books and worksheets. This pattern of one sensory system compensating for the deficiencies of another can also be observed among the blind.[vii]<br /><br />The high rates of impulsivity, hyperactivity, and distractibility seen in children with sensory processing disorders can often make it difficult to determine in particular children whether these behaviors are simply manifestations of sensory dysfunction or whether they are signs of a primary attentional disorder like ADHD. In our experience the purely behavioral criteria for ADHD listed in the DSM-IV are not particularly useful in making these distinction. Nearly all of the children in our sample with hyperactivity and/or impulsivity would meet these criteria, yet we do not feel most of these children show sufficient evidence of a primary attentional disorder to merit a diagnosis of ADHD. Although there are as yet no generally accepted criteria for distinguishing between these conditions, and though in our sample 33% of children were diagnosed with both, we have found two criteria useful in distinguishing children whose hyperactivity appears to be due to sensory processing disorders and those in whom it appears to result from primary attentional disorders. First, we believe the diagnosis of ADHD is best suited to children who show generalized attentional impairment in all areas of testing, rather than those who have selective attentional problems only with tasks that stress struggling visual or auditory systems. Second, we find the ADHD label better suited for those children whose self-stimulatory and hyperactive behaviors produce a worsening of performance instead of an improvement.<br /><br />Just the other day we had a young patient who exceeded age norms on many portions of our tests while working non-stop on the most elaborate piece of theraputty pizza (complete with pepperoni and<br />mushrooms) ever made. Hyperactive? Yes. Sensory seeking? Yes. Attentional impairment? Not that we can detect.<br />What's the bottom line? In children with impulsivity and hyperactivity, the answer should never simply be a straight line to stimulants. It is crucial to evaluate such children for disorders of sensory integration and other visual, auditory, or somatosensory impairments.<br /><br />About the Authors: Brock and Fernette Eide are physicians and consultants to a wide range of parent, teacher, and clinical professional groups seeking more information about brain-based difficulties and their solutions. Together they have authored more than 50 articles and they speak internationally for keynote lectures, seminars, workshops, and small groups. The Eides can be contacted through their website at: www.neurolearning.com or by email at: drseide@gmail.com.]]></description>
            <author> drseide@gmail.com (Administrator)</author>
            <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 04:06:15 GMT</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://neurolearning.com/Library/component/content/article/12-sensory-processing/6-hyperactivity-impulsivity-sensory-processing</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Sensory Motor Dysgraphia Misdiagnosed as Underachievement</title>
            <link>http://neurolearning.com/Library/component/content/article/12-sensory-processing/5-sensory-motor-dysgraphia-misdiagnosed-as-underachievement</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>In our practice, unrecognized dysgraphia is a common cause of 'underachievement' and 'oppositionally-defiant disorder' in school age children, particularly boys. For some reason, dysgraphia has not garnered the attention of 'attention deficit disorder' or or other learning disabilities, and therefore children who are struggling with undiagnosed disabilities are mistaken for being lazy or defiant.  </p><p>A child who is lame, rarely will be scolded or told to run extra laps at home, but a child with fine motor or other causes of dysgraphia is may be publicly disgraced about 'sloppy work', told to finish work at home (though it could take hours or be practically impossible), or denied recess on a regular basis to 'finish work.'  </p><p>There are several types of dysgraphia, but in this post, we will discuss motor dysgraphia, or difficulty writing due to impaired fine motor or sensory-motor coordination. </p><p> A variety of dysfunctional hand grips that occur in a variety of clinical settings - but most often mild birth injury or prematurity. Though motor / sensory-motor dysgraphia is remarkably common in today's classroom (perhaps because of rising prematurity or greater survival of high risk pregnancies), teachers receive little instruction in its occurrence, and accommodations are woefully underutilized. Dysfunctional grips often have the pencil tipped forward or out of the webspace. The first three fingers are not brought together in a pinch, but rather fisted or awkwardly positioned with the sides of fingers. When children are forced to writing with very dysfunctional grasps, then pain or even repetitive stress injuries can result. Often children develop behavioral problems like task or school avoidance. Occupational therapy may help many children, but sometimes time and accommodation are essential to allow handwriting to develop to a functional level.  </p><p>The first link below is to a paper describes how brain-based injury to sensory-motor systems causes individuals to press harder than normal to compensate for their loss of control. The paper concludes, "When sensory information is degraded, an increase of grip force is interpreted as a compensatory strategic increase of the safety margin to protect against unexpected load perturbations that cannot be rapidly and accurately sense ands responded by a reactive grip force increase."  Children with mild neurological injury may use a very tight grasp on the pen or pencil that results in heavy pencil pressure, poor writing endurance, and hand cramping. Some teachers or administrators fear that providing a student with appropriate dysgraphia-related accommodations will result in a child "never learning to write"; however, this is not true. In fact, by denying children appropriate accommodations, these students may never be given adequate practice with higher order writing tasks like paragraph organization or redrafting, because they can't get much down on the page by hand.  </p><p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=15589626">Tighter grip compensates for lack of control</a><br />  </p><p><strong>The Cerebellar Child</strong>     We wanted to talk specifically about cerebellar kids, because they are common sources of "mild" or soft neurological signs, but their impact on learning, activities of daily living (self-care, mood control, appetite), sensory-motor and sensory-sensory coordination, and social interaction can be tremendous.  It turns out the cerebellum is particularly vulnerable to prenatal or perinatal stress, and cerebellar differences are found in groups of kids diagnosed with premature birth, mild birth injury, dyslexia, ADD / ADHD, and autism spectrum disorders.  The cerebellum is sometimes referred to as the "primitive brain" because it's more along the lines of reflexive or automatic action rather than conscious thought. It used to be taught that large amounts of cerebellum could be removed (for instance because of tumor) without any significant functional deficits, but now we know that the cerebellum is involved in a lot more important cognitive functions than we were previously aware.  Looking at the complex pattern of connections that pass through the cerebellum (sensory-sensory, sensory-motor, motor-motor coordination), it may come as no surprise to you that even mild cerebellar problems can produce major practical life disruptions in a child's automatic pilot (moving, balancing, speaking, or performing other skilled activities without thinking, bodily appetites and arousal, and response to danger, pain, or environmental change). Sensory processing disorder kids are often really cerebellar kids - at least from the standpoint of a neurological exam. </p><p> It's not necessarily that a child has problems all over his or her nervous system; it may be that problems have arisen in brain location that is a great relay center for sensory inputs and motor plans.    </p><p>Because the cerebellum is important for triggering escape reactions in response to threat, children with even seemingly mild cerebellar problems may have trouble with quick changes in routine, and have especially volatile emotions when young and before the frontal cognitive controls have really matured. </p><p>&nbsp;</p><p> <a href="http://brain.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/121/4/561">Cerebellar cognitive affective</a></p><a href="http://eideneurolearningblog.blogspot.com/2005/11/creativity-bipolar-disease-and-adhd.html">Eide Neurolearning Blog: Creativity, Bipolar, and ADHD</a>]]></description>
            <author> drseide@gmail.com (Administrator)</author>
            <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 03:01:11 GMT</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://neurolearning.com/Library/component/content/article/12-sensory-processing/5-sensory-motor-dysgraphia-misdiagnosed-as-underachievement</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Twice Exceptional Learners: Gifted Students with Learning Disabilities</title>
            <link>http://neurolearning.com/Library/component/content/article/4-gifted-2e/4-twice-exceptional-learners-gifted-students-with-learning-disabilities</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%"><font><font size="3"><font face="'times new roman', times" class="Apple-style-span"><br />“Unevenness is the rule among academically gifted children, while global giftedness...is the exception”  - Ellen Winner  </font></font></font></p><p style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%"><font><font size="3"><font face="'times new roman', times" class="Apple-style-span"><br />On the basis of IQ, gifted children are more likely to show wide discrepancies between subtest scores than non-gifted children. In one study in the Port Washington school district (Sweetland), 54.7% of gifted students showed a greater than 18 point discrepancy between their WISC-III VIQ / PIQ, compared to 17.0% of a control sample. As a result, twice-exceptionality, or giftedness with learning disabilities is more the rule in gifted populations, than the exception. Despite this frequency, twice exceptional or 2E students may find themselves struggling to fit into conventional school curriculum - too advanced for some lessons, but behind in others -as a result these kids are often in a situation in which neither their gifts nor their challenges are recognized. <br /><br /></font></font></font><font><font size="3"><font face="'times new roman', times" class="Apple-style-span"><strong>Step 1</strong></font></font></font><font><font size="3"><font face="'times new roman', times" class="Apple-style-span"><strong>:</strong></font></font></font><font><font size="3"><font face="'times new roman', times" class="Apple-style-span"><strong> Identification of Twice Exceptionality</strong></font></font></font><font><font size="3"><font face="'times new roman', times" class="Apple-style-span"><strong> </strong> If we were to give one piece of advice, it would be to have a high index of suspicion for 2E. Gifted students often have many resources at their disposal to hide difficulties in sensory processing, reading and writing, and attention and organization,  so that although they may perform well enough in the classroom,  they may wear themselves down with extra work at home, become anxious or depressed, and achieve much less than their potential would predict.  Wide discrepancies may  be noted in IQ tests taken for entrance to public or private school gifted programs - but sometimes a twice exceptional student will only begin to show difficulties in the later grades as the quantity of information and work expectations increases.  <br /><br /></font></font></font><font><font size="3"><font face="'times new roman', times" class="Apple-style-span"><strong>Step 2</strong></font></font></font><font><font size="3"><font face="'times new roman', times" class="Apple-style-span"><strong>: </strong></font></font></font><font><font size="3"><font face="'times new roman', times" class="Apple-style-span"><strong>Recognizing the Challenges</strong></font></font></font><font><font size="3"><font face="'times new roman', times" class="Apple-style-span">  Recognizing the challenges are not always easy tasks in twice exceptional students because gifted students can use higher order strengths to compensate for lower order perceptual weaknesses or processing problems. For instance, a gifted dyslexic student may use his strong contextual filling-in ability to compensate for weaknesses in individual word reading, or a verbally-gifted student may mask his difficulty with organization and writing by getting help from friends and family. Higher order skills in reasoning and problem solving ability might help students get by with routine classroom and social scenarios, but things can fall apart if the demands are too intense (finals), or real-time multi-tasking (note-taking in a challenging class, unpredictable new social environments) is required.Wide discrepancies in subtest scores may be helpful, but some gifted students can also find away to mask their weaknesses on these. For instance, gifted students with a weakness in visual memory may still ace standardized visual memory tests because they verbally describe what they see so that the information is stored in their auditory memory. Nevertheless, this weakness in visual 'snapshot' memory is important to recognize because these students will have have trouble with visually demanding lessons (diagrams, multi-stepped math work, charts, etc.) and often note-taking in general. When we assess twice exceptional students, we make a point of asking how they arrived at answers  - because the compensatory strategies taken may reveal the sources of problems in school performance.<br /><br /></font></font></font><font><font size="3"><font face="'times new roman', times" class="Apple-style-span"><strong>Step 3</strong></font></font></font><font><font size="3"><font face="'times new roman', times" class="Apple-style-span"><strong>:</strong></font></font></font><font><font size="3"><font face="'times new roman', times" class="Apple-style-span"><strong> Encouraging Self Understanding</strong>  </font></font></font><font><font size="3"><font face="'times new roman', times" class="Apple-style-span">We believe that self understanding should be a primary goal for helping twice exceptional students. The frustrations of 2E students are often poorly understood and underestimated because from an outside view, these kids and young adults may look successful. But the personal burdens are often significant - children who destroy their own work because they are ashamed of what their hands can produce, kids who feel like they are frauds because they don't really understand what others assume they know.  Children normally see the world and themselves in 'absolutes' - Good vs. Bad - and as a result, they struggle to accept their contradictory selves.<br /><br /></font></font></font><font><font size="3"><font face="'times new roman', times" class="Apple-style-span"><strong>Step 4</strong></font></font></font><font><font size="3"><font face="'times new roman', times" class="Apple-style-span"><strong>: </strong></font></font></font><font><font size="3"><font face="'times new roman', times" class="Apple-style-span"><strong>School and Test-Based Accommodations</strong> - 504  </font></font></font><font><font size="3"><font face="'times new roman', times" class="Apple-style-span"> Since the 2004 re-authorization of the IDEA, twice exceptional students have qualified for individual support in the form of 504 accommodations or an IEP. From Wrightslaw.com: "</font></font></font><font><font size="3"><font face="'times new roman', times" class="Apple-style-span">Twice-exceptional</font></font></font><font><font size="3"><font face="'times new roman', times" class="Apple-style-span"> children are gifted children of above average abilities who have special educational needs - AD/HD, learning disabilities, Asperger Syndrome, etc. Because their giftedness can mask their special needs and their special needs can hide their giftedness, they are often labeled as "lazy" and "unmotivated".</font></font></font></p> <p style="margin-top: 0.07in; margin-bottom: 0.07in; line-height: 100%"> <font><font size="3"><font face="'times new roman', times" class="Apple-style-span">Some schools and school districts have refused to allow qualified students with disabilities to participate in accelerated or gifted and talented programs and have required these students to give up the services designed to meet their individual needs. These practices are inconsistent with Federal law.</font></font></font></p> <p style="margin-top: 0.07in; margin-bottom: 0.07in; line-height: 100%"> <font><font size="3"><font face="'times new roman', times" class="Apple-style-span">OCR says that if schools "condition" participation in accelerated classes or programs by qualified students with disabilities by requiring these students to forfeit their necessary special education or related aids and services, it amounts to a </font></font></font><font><font size="3"><font face="'times new roman', times" class="Apple-style-span">denial of FAPE</font></font></font><font><font size="3"><font face="'times new roman', times" class="Apple-style-span"> under Part B of the IDEA and Section 504."<br /><br />For more reading on Dual or Twice Exceptionality:<br /><br /><a href="http://www.hoagiesgifted.org/twice_exceptional.htm">Twice Exceptional Pages at HoagiesGifted.org</a><br /><a href="http://www.nagc.org/index.aspx?id=973">Twice Exceptional at the NAGC</a><br /><a href="http://2enewsletter.blogspot.com/">Twice Exceptional Newsletter Blog</a><br /><a href="http://www.sengifted.org/articles_parenting/collins_2e_back_to_school.shtml">Twice Exceptional at SENG</a></font></font></font> </p>]]></description>
            <author> drseide@gmail.com (Administrator)</author>
            <pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 06:27:12 GMT</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://neurolearning.com/Library/component/content/article/4-gifted-2e/4-twice-exceptional-learners-gifted-students-with-learning-disabilities</guid>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
